Marshawn Kneeland. Waste of a 2nd Round Pick

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
Our defense really struggled stopping the run, especially in those outside runs where our defensive ends struggled to set the edge. If he allows the defense to see more 3rd and longs, any pass rush is a bonus. Can he become a 6-8 sack type of player? I think so.
That’s fair…if he can float around 8ish sacks with great run. D it’s a homerun pick.

But how many small school players with very little production have turned into that? That’s my problem / concern.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,709
Reaction score
44,658
Kneeland is a an elite athlete that has raw tools to develop, there is a reason why many view him at top 50 prospect where Fehoko was more of a day 3 player with limited upside. I think Kneeland can become an Epenesa type player at the very least.
Espenesa or Karlaftis; that’s the hope for sure.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,224
Reaction score
20,259
That’s fair…if he can float around 8ish sacks with great run. D it’s a homerun pick.

But how many small school players with very little production have turned into that? That’s my problem / concern.
You can see his power, even when he went against better competition at the Senior Bowl, but all he has is a bull rush at this juncture. He needs to develop other moves. Not a real bendy guy, where he might kick inside against the pass. Less worried about him then the Linebacker we drafted.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
Espenesa or Karlaftis; that’s the hope for sure.
Karlaftis is a pipe dream…dude was a pass rush technician coming out of college and has turned into a stud. He was my choice over Tyler in the hindsight draft and I stand on that take all day long considering what OLmen we could’ve gotten later that draft.

It’s honestly pretty hard finding a good comp for Kneeland. I still think Fehoko is the best one I’ve seen. I actually really liked the Fehoko pick bc he was a run D savage and we got him in the 4th. I think he was hurt last year so really anxious to see if he turns it on this year and Kneeland can surprise me.

I hate to sound like a negative nancy but I’m a realist. Nothing would make me happier than being wrong on Kneeland.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
You can see his power, even when he went against better competition at the Senior Bowl, but all he has is a bull rush at this juncture. He needs to develop other moves. Not a real bendy guy, where he might kick inside against the pass. Less worried about him than the Linebacker we drafted.
I hear ya, I’m going to cross my fingers and hold my breath. I’m just not optimistic bc his play profile / small school / lack of production terrifies me.

I’ll be rooting for him regardless.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,224
Reaction score
20,259
I hear ya, I’m going to cross my fingers and hold my breath. I’m just not optimistic bc his play profile / small school / lack of production terrifies me.

I’ll be rooting for him regardless.
At worst he is a strong run defender and makes an impact right away.

OT-heard Guyton is working with Duke Mayweather, this is an excellent sign that he is willing to work to improve his game
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
At worst he is a strong run defender and makes an impact right away.

OT-heard Guyton is working with Duke Mayweather, this is an excellent sign that he is willing to work to improve his game
We’ll see…the at worst scenario doesn’t warrant a premium pick for me.

That was the hope for guys like Golston and Fehoko and they’ve barely seen the field.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,709
Reaction score
44,658
Karlaftis is a pipe dream…dude was a pass rush technician coming out of college and has turned into a stud. He was my choice over Tyler in the hindsight draft and I stand on that take all day long considering what OLmen we could’ve gotten later that draft.

It’s honestly pretty hard finding a good comp for Kneeland. I still think Fehoko is the best one I’ve seen. I actually really liked the Fehoko pick bc he was a run D savage and we got him in the 4th. I think he was hurt last year so really anxious to see if he turns it on this year and Kneeland can surprise me.

I hate to sound like a negative nancy but I’m a realist. Nothing would make me happier than being wrong on Kneeland.
Yeah, I’m talking more about his ceiling after development moreso than what he is in an immediate context.

I don’t think you’re being negative. His lack of production at a lower-level cannot be ignored. There’s definitely a world 2-3 years from now where he’s clearly a JAG and all this positivity and optimistic projection is forgotten.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
Yeah, I’m talking more about his ceiling after development moreso than what he is in an immediate context.

I don’t think you’re being negative. His lack of production at a lower-level cannot be ignored. There’s definitely a world 2-3 years from now where he’s clearly a JAG and all this positivity and optimistic projection is forgotten.
Yea…in that case I agree George is a good comp for best case scenario but man he’s got miles to go to get there.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,961
Reaction score
23,105
Yea…in that case I agree George is a good comp for best case scenario but man he’s got miles to go to get there.
Kneeland does know how to use his hands. He does that against the run. He just wasn't taught pass rush technique. That actually was an issue with Micah Parsons at Penn St. He did not look like a top pass rusher because he had no technique. He looked like a blitzer only. But he worked on his hand technique before the season and all of a sudden showed elite pass rush ability. No telling how long it will take Kneeland but he shows a lot of promise just by his hand usuage in run situations,
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,224
Reaction score
20,259
We’ll see…the at worst scenario doesn’t warrant a premium pick for me.

That was the hope for guys like Golston and Fehoko and they’ve barely seen the field.
Kneeland isn't the same category as either player mentioned, those two are considered rotational type of role players and both were considered day 3 prospects when they came out. Kneeland was a legitimate top 60 prospect. Golston/Fehoko offer zero pass rush abilities. Kneeland did have close to 40 pressures, 30 hurries and just 6 sacks. This tells me he struggles to finish. He probably wasn't getting great coaching on that level, let's see how they can develop him on the NFL level. Even right now, he offers impact as a rusher, he will blow up the pocket and allow others to clean it up!
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
Kneeland does know how to use his hands. He does that against the run. He just wasn't taught pass rush technique. That actually was an issue with Micah Parsons at Penn St. He did not look like a top pass rusher because he had no technique. He looked like a blitzer only. But he worked on his hand technique before the season and all of a sudden showed elite pass rush ability. No telling how long it will take Kneeland but he shows a lot of promise just by his hand usuage in run situations,
I don’t think it’s fair to compare Kneeland or anyone really to Parsons. He’s arguably one of the freakiest athletes in the NFL and has a combination of burst / bend / speed that only a handful of dudes on the planet. Yes, he had to refine his technique but his ceiling was incredibly high due to his other worldly athleticism.

Sure Kneeland can and likely will improve his pass rush technique but he’s never going to have the straight speed rush off the edge with the ability to flatten the corner that Parsons has.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
Kneeland isn't the same category as either player mentioned, those two are considered rotational type of role players and both were considered day 3 prospects when they came out. Kneeland was a legitimate top 60 prospect. Golston/Fehoko offer zero pass rush abilities. Kneeland did have close to 40 pressures, 30 hurries and just 6 sacks. This tells me he struggles to finish. He probably wasn't getting great coaching on that level, let's see how they can develop him on the NFL level. Even right now, he offers impact as a rusher, he will blow up the pocket and allow others to clean it up!
Yes - I understand Kneeland is a higher rated prospect than those guys but saying they have zero pass rush ability while Kneeland does seems like a bold take.

Then why did Fehoko absolutely obliterate Kneelands pass rush productivity as a prospect?
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,224
Reaction score
20,259
Yes - I understand Kneeland is a higher rated prospect than those guys but saying they have zero pass rush ability while Kneeland does seems like a bold take.

Then why did Fehoko absolutely obliterate Kneelands pass rush productivity as a prospect?
Teams are banking on Kneeland's athletic traits over his production. He should of been a better player with those testing numbers, question is can he develop with better coaching? Fehoko was the opposite, a poor athlete that had production on the college level, where many question how he will translate on the NFL level.

Most NFL Teams draft for upside not for floor. If a particular player has those, elite physical traits, they believe they can teach him how to play with better technique. Kneeland is no different then a player like Tyler Smith, had all the physical attributes just needed to clean up his technique and footwork. Kneeland is going to have Greg Ellis/DLaw teaching him, two very good technicians. Many think he has the potential to become a DLaw type of player, but he has a long way to go. Some develop quickly, some struggle for a few seasons, some never get there, we just have to see. This pick isn't for just next season but for the future.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
Teams are banking on Kneeland's athletic traits over his production. He should of been a better player with those testing numbers, question is can he develop with better coaching? Fehoko was the opposite, a poor athlete that had production on the college level, where many question how he will translate on the NFL level.

Most NFL Teams draft for upside not for floor. If a particular player has those, elite physical traits, they believe they can teach him how to play with better technique. Kneeland is no different then a player like Tyler Smith, had all the physical attributes just needed to clean up his technique and footwork. Kneeland is going to have Greg Ellis/DLaw teaching him, two very good technicians. Many think he has the potential to become a DLaw type of player, but he has a long way to go. Some develop quickly, some struggle for a few seasons, some never get there, we just have to see. This pick isn't for just next season but for the future.
I get it…I understand there’s upside for pass rushing but I’m not using a premium pick on a small schooler that had borderline below average production. If we’re having this discussion about a 3/4th rounder it makes total sense.

But we’re honestly talking about drafting an outlier in the 2nd. How many recent small school DEs have not had high production and turned into above average players in the NFL? Zero prospects come to mind. I’m sure we can dig some up but is it honesty worth it drafting an outlier in the 2nd?

And I don’t think it’s fair to compare Kneeland to an OLmen…
 

Malhavoc

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
2,301
This fanbase is living in fantasy land. Go look at the 2022 2nd round of that NFL draft. You are more likely to get a Sam Williams type of player in round 2. Just average production. Trevon Diggs ain’t the norm. Your expectations for the player are not realisti. If Kneeland becomes a 6 sack player that defends the run at an elite level then that’s a great pick. Especially for a soft bunch that needs every bit of what this kid has to offer. Had the team added a player like DJ Reader in FA, now you would have 3 high level run defenders on your DL. Huuuge difference. Now all your eggs are are with Mazi who you may have already screwed up with your weight loss experiment. Trying to turn the player into something he’s not. In the end Kneeland is going to be a fine addition. The middle of the DL that’s a different story.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,898
Reaction score
9,808
This fanbase is living in fantasy land. Go look at the 2022 2nd round of that NFL draft. You are more likely to get a Sam Williams type of player in round 2. Just average production. Trevon Diggs ain’t the norm. Your expectations for the player are not realisti. If Kneeland becomes a 6 sack player that defends the run at an elite level then that’s a great pick. Especially for a soft bunch that needs every bit of what this kid has to offer. Had the team added a player like DJ Reader in FA, now you would have 3 high level run defenders on your DL. Huuuge difference. Now all your eggs are are with Mazi who you may have already screwed up with your weight loss experiment. Trying to turn the player into something he’s not. In the end Kneeland is going to be a fine addition. The middle of the DL that’s a different story.
The problem is Williams was also a massive reach lol…it’s the continuation of head scratchers in the 2nd round that is mind boggling.

And I’m with you on exoectations though…feel like some fans overestimate how rookies will come in. I’m with you if Kneeland turns into that kind of player that’s great…but what you’ve referenced is a loooooooong way to go for him.
Williams led the SEC in sacks and he can barely get on the field…and now we’re talking about Kneeland coming in and developing into an above average pass rusher? Don’t see it.
 

Malhavoc

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
2,301
The problem is Williams was also a massive reach lol…it’s the continuation of head scratchers in the 2nd round that is mind boggling.

And I’m with you on exoectations though…feel like some fans overestimate how rookies will come in. I’m with you if Kneeland turns into that kind of player that’s great…but what you’ve referenced is a loooooooong way to go for him.
Williams led the SEC in sacks and he can barely get on the field…and now we’re talking about Kneeland coming in and developing into an above average pass rusher? Don’t see it.
Tell me how many players in the 2022 draft 2nd round have performed above average by your estimaton ? Your expectations are too high. How many sacks does a 2nd round pick have to have to justify his selection. And Kneeland by most experts was not a so called reach.
 
Top