Martin contract getting closer but not official until contract details are released

DIAF

DivaLover159
Messages
4,654
Reaction score
736
PAPPYDOG said:
Dak-bots in the end name calling is there only venue as the fans have eyes and know a terrible QB when they see one!
Let's see Dak-bot our team has the most expensive offline in the NFL now with 4 no 1 picks and a 2 pick and the Best HB in the league if your man Noodles Dak cant score at least 30 points a game what excuses are you bringing to these nice forums to excuse the Dak man?...Dak bots where reality is a NON-Issue.....
Click to expand...

I picked the wrong time to look at the board. Im not a Dak fan but this is what goes on now? Going after other fans like this? You realize we all like the same team right
 
Corso

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,718
Reaction score
63,097
DIAF said:
I picked the wrong time to look at the board. Im not a Dak fan but this is what goes on now? Going after other fans like this? You realize we all like the same team right
Click to expand...
Some people want their team liked a certain way, I guess...
 
CapnB

CapnB

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
2,959
Not sure if its been mentioned in the 8 pages of this thread, but before this contract we were supposed to be 72 mil under the cap next year. Yeah Martin takes a bit off that. But it's way more than the cowboys have ever been since the salary cap era begun. I'm just guessing on that last part. So someone correct me if i'm wrong.
 

Ccijcladac

Active Member
Messages
318
Reaction score
177
It's not wise& not patriot- like to pay a customary position as guard the top salary@ that position in the league but pay the antithesis of that position a D- tackle pennies on dollars.This front office hasn't gotten it right for decades now& the philosophy keeps changing.
As long as we continue to adhere to this philosophy that u don't pay or don't give up high resources (1,2,3rd picks) to D- tackles in order to stop the run but u pay the position of OG that a D-tackles plays against, we will continue to get the results we have been getting for the better part of 2 decades. It's maddening & it's definitely a flawed philosophy.
 
phildadon86

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,236
Reaction score
31,707
Ccijcladac said:
It's not wise& not patriot- like to pay a customary position as guard the top salary@ that position in the league but pay the antithesis of that position a D- tackle pennies on dollars.This front office hasn't gotten it right for decades now& the philosophy keeps changing.
As long as we continue to adhere to this philosophy that u don't pay or don't give up high resou
Click to expand...
What language is this?
 
LandryFan

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,399
Reaction score
6,339
Doomsday said:
6 years, $80 million seems pretty reasonable to me. $32 guaranteed is quite a bit though.

Thought he would average more than $13.3 a season.
Click to expand...
Guarantees are always risky because health isn't guaranteed. That said, Martin seems about as low risk as you can get, so I'm not too worried about his guarantee.
 

Ccijcladac

Active Member
Messages
318
Reaction score
177
phildadon86 said:
What language is this?
Click to expand...
The language where u don't pay OG's the top salary in the game, yet u pay the position OG's play directly against (DT's) nothing or minimal pay. Very simple to me but hey I can see why that maybe too complex for you
 
windward

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,541
Reaction score
4,419
Rayman70 said:
amen. Spot on. This crap of how we don't really need Martin..is a farce. Tired of posts like that. Its either pure ignorance or someone just don't know how football games are won. Its starts up front.
Click to expand...
If this didn’t get done, all we’d hear about was how cheap Stephen was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top