PJTHEDOORS
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,190
- Reaction score
- 18,582
And 3 of the past 4 years 99 out of 100 people would be wrong.
Who's the jury? lol.
And 3 of the past 4 years 99 out of 100 people would be wrong.
And their price is most likely quite high. If the Vikings are as high on Peterson still as they claim and envision him being there until the day he retires, they aren't giving him up for at least a few draft picks; and a couple of them will be high. That's about as dead as it can be in this league.
Once the May cuts date passed, that was it. I don't see Peterson ever playing in Dallas, and it will be a good thing. We don't need to be giving up premium picks for Peterson.
Who's the jury? lol.
Results are the only jury that matters, the fact that 3 of the past 4 years Forte has had more yards than Peterson is a pretty good jury.
I'm guessing if Forte is indeed better than Peterson, no way Chicago trades him.
Probably not, but worth talking about anyway. Though just wondering, why wouldn't you want a guy who had 1846 yards last year and averaged 5.7 yards every time he touched the ball? Isn't that sort of ideal if you are willing to ignore the age thing (like so many obviously are with Peterson).
I want the guy who can play 16 games not the guy who is liable to be injured or decided his son needs leaves in his mouth... so what's your point?
I want the guy that scores, what's yours?
Results are the only jury that matters, the fact that 3 of the past 4 years Forte has had more yards than Peterson is a pretty good jury.
Why would they let Murray walk and then turn around and give up a draft pick to pay an older RB the same amount of money?
Yep.
That's why any trade speculation for Forte or Peterson is pure rubbish IMO.
The Cowboys had a chance to pay a 27-YO back that kind of coin AND NOT have to sacrifice a draft pick– and didn't do it.
They aren't trading any premium picks and they aren't paying any running back $7+ mil per season.
Some fan's here aren't happy unless we have so called pro bowlers at every position. Get rid of TWilliams, get rid of Leary, get rid of Carr and Claiborne, get rid of Wilcox and Church. Hope Randle proves people wrong. If not, then I'm sure Jerry and Stephen have a backup plan.
Why would they let Murray walk and then turn around and give up a draft pick to pay an older RB the same amount of money?
I'm guessing if Forte is indeed better than Peterson, no way Chicago trades him.
Why? Because maybe they didn't think Murray was worth that amount of money
Doesn't mean somebody else isn't worth it