AmericasTeam81
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,310
- Reaction score
- 5,771
I have a $100 bet at +1000 on Micah leading the league in sacks. I better not lose the bet by one sack.
Micah needs to let his actions do the talking.
Game announcers are about 100 yards away - not a closeup video where you can clearly see him get his foot. You might want to go to the eye doctor!
I wish I could just post a pic from my computer versus doing the whole URL thing. Parsons grabs his ankle. Goff goes down. Go look at it again.
It should be Parsons’ sack.
He might just be joking around with Armstrong, but even if he isn't, why should Armstrong get credit for Micah's sack?I’m not sure it’s a very good look for Micah Parsons to be lobbying for an extra sack for himself when it will be taken away from his teammate.
He might just be joking around with Armstrong, but even if he isn't, why should Armstrong get credit for Micah's sack?
Who cares what the "game announcer" said? I never understood why people try to use that as proof their opinion is correct. Are his eyes better than yours? Is he watching the replay 30 times or seeing every angle available?I’m not the one who’s blind it’s you guys. Lol Even the game announcer said Armstrong tripped him up.
It should be Parsons’ sack.
Armstrong should be de-credited for getting in Parsons' way.If I'm not mistaken, they gave Armstrong credit for the sack on that play.
I love Micah, but I kind of wish he felt this way also...Don't really care who gets credit for it. The important thing is the D sacked Goff.
It was a couple yards from LOSNeed to see the beginning to establish the LOS. It looks like Goff may have gotten past the LOS for a short gain.
I still see Armstrong with 6 sacks so seems like neither got it. After the play the Announcer said Armstrong with a sack thoughArmstrong should be de-credited for getting in Parsons' way.
If he has monetary incentives in his contract for number of sacks, I can't fault him.I love Micah, but I kind of wish he felt this way also...
He wouldn't have that in a rookie deal. But maybe Armstrong does?If he has monetary incentives in his contract for number of sacks, I can't fault him.
Why not? Are all rookie contracts standard?He wouldn't have that in a rookie deal. But maybe Armstrong does?
Why not? Are all rookie contracts standard?
Do they not have incentives such as pro bowl nominations, performance bonuses?
You can tell that many people (on this board) have their opinion's shaped by the announcers.Who cares what the "game announcer" said? I never understood why people try to use that as proof their opinion is correct. Are his eyes better than yours? Is he watching the replay 30 times or seeing every angle available?