I'm not a legal expert, but I know some on CZ are;
I would lose all faith in the legal system if the NFL weasels their way out of this.
Their investigation and decision on this one are so egregiously tainted it's unbelievable. I know some are saying the outside courts can only rule on the process, not whether Zeke was guilty or not... but can anyone explain to me how a judge could overlook the mounting evidence of his innocence?
Is the NFL off the hook for their ultimate decision of finding him violating the conduct policy even though the evidence is overwhelmingly in Zeke's favor?
Is the outside court only going to be focusing on the collusion aspect of the investigatory process? If so, don't you have to weigh the evidence of the case that they conveniently ignored for their final decision of suspension?
I'm just trying to figure out what Zeke's lawyers will be arguing in the outside court, and examples that they will be pointing to.