PFF: Dak Prescott had the highest single game grade by a QB since 2007

[Diehardblues]

But it's true, isn't it? Doesn't this fact dispel the "Dak and the Cowboys haven't beat a .500+ team in 2023" so far false narrative? Or do you like picking and choosing which team(s) were .500+ rated team(s) at the time they played the Cowboys this season so that it can please your conscience?

Actually it doesn’t. The narrative is supported by what teams records currently are . I understand fans don’t like the narrative. But it’s accurate based on their criteria.

If you want to start a new narrative or create a different criteria saying we beat a team “at the time “ with a winning record that’s fine.

These narratives are meaningless. All they do is support a negative argument much like these narratives with Dak supporting a more positive argument. All noise either way. Winning will silence it. Nothing else.

 

[Diehardblues]

These narratives are nothing more than noise . But they become monkeys on our back like the drought in championship games.

We were called Next Years Champions when I was younger. It was a huge monkey on our backs. Only way to stop it is to win.

 

[Diehardblues]

Oh of course lol. Criticism and narratives are just media fodder to me. What we did in 1999 has no bearance on the 2023 team.

Right. It has no bearing unless it gets into their heads by listening to the noise.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Right. It has no bearing unless it gets into their heads by listening to the noise.

Yeah and that part I hope doesn't happen. New year and new team.

 

[Momanpr100]

I hope he keeps it up. Ten different people caught passes. Keep 'em guessing.

That was the stat that stood out. Really spreading that ball around

 

[America's Cowboy]

Actually it doesn’t. The narrative is supported by what teams records currently are . I understand fans don’t like the narrative. But it’s accurate based on their criteria.

If you want to start a new narrative or create a different criteria saying we beat a team “at the time “ with a winning record that’s fine.

These narratives are meaningless. All they do is support a negative argument much like these narratives with Dak supporting a more positive argument. All noise either way. Winning will silence it. Nothing else.

You're wrong and you know it. No fool has any base to argue "the Cowboys have not beaten a .500+ team in 2023" midway through the season when in reality the Cowboys did beat a .500+ team AT THE TIME during Week 2. You can't have it both ways just to fit YOUR NARRATIVE. End-of-season or after-date-played team records does not accurately explain whether a team has beaten a .500+ rated team or not. Take this to any legal court, and you will lose your argument. Guaranteed.

 

[starfan1]

DaK Can go 17-0 throw for 700 yards and 8 TDs a game and none of it matters if he can’t beat a good team in post season AND
right now as it stands he can’t beat a good team in post season .

Prove us all wrong Dak.

So wins are a qb stat?

 

[Diehardblues]

You're wrong and you know it. No fool has any base to argue "the Cowboys have not beaten a .500+ team in 2023" midway through the season when in reality the Cowboys did beat a .500+ team AT THE TIME during Week 2. You can't have it both ways just to fit YOUR NARRATIVE. End-of-season or after-date-played team records does not accurately explain whether a team has beaten a .500+ rated team or not. Take this to any legal court, and you will lose your argument. Guaranteed.

There’s only one way AC. It’s their record at the end of season and or current at time of narrative. That’s always how these type of arguments are presented.

Like I said. This is their narrative. If you want to start your narrative to include we beat the Jets when they were1-0 that’s fine but it’s not what I’d call a good rebuttal to their narrative. The Jets suk.

 

[America's Cowboy]

There’s only one way AC. It’s their record at the end of season and or current at time of narrative. That’s always how these type of arguments are presented.

Like I said. This is their narrative. If you want to start your narrative to include we beat the Jets when they were1-0 that’s fine but it’s not what I’d call a good rebuttal to their narrative.

Facts are Facts, regardless of any narrative. The Cowboys have already beaten a .500+ team at the time they played that team this 2023 season. That's a fact.

 

[Momanpr100]

There’s only one way AC. It’s their record at the end of season and or current at time of narrative. That’s always how these type of arguments are presented.

Like I said. This is their narrative. If you want to start your narrative to include we beat the Jets when they were1-0 that’s fine but it’s not what I’d call a good rebuttal to their narrative.

All the narratives is wrong, a .500 team now can easily be under .500 at the end of the year. It's just a stat for the Cowoys, that is all. We'll know the true answer at the end of the year, when all teams play 17 games. It's not like Dak or this team never ever beat a winning team.

 

[Diehardblues]

All the narratives is wrong, a .500 team now can easily be under .500 at the end of the year. It's just a stat for the Cowoys, that is all. We'll know the true answer at the end of the year, when all teams play 17 games. It's not like Dak or this team never ever beat a winning team.

I wouldn’t say the narratives are wrong. They are created to support their argument . We just don’t like the narrative .

And we haven’t beaten a winning record team this year . It didn’t say ever as we know isn’t correct.

But I think we will beat a team with a winning record this year and end this narrative . We did last year. Winning always silences the noise.

 

[Diehardblues]

Facts are Facts, regardless of any narrative. The Cowboys have already beaten a .500+ team at the time they played that team this 2023 season. That's a fact.

Yes it is. But it doesn’t fit the narrative .

 

[Momanpr100]

I wouldn’t say the narratives are wrong. They are created to support their argument . We just don’t like the narrative .

And we haven’t beaten a winning record team this year . It didn’t say ever as we know isn’t correct.

But I think we will beat a team with a winning record this year and end this narrative . We did last year. Winning always silences the noise.

Agree to disagree, new narratives are made everyday for the Cowboys, so I don't buy into made up narratives.

 

[Sully]

We have us a QB!

And still has a losing record vs winning teams PLUS not a single NFC Conference game. Get this team to that game Dak

 

[Sully]

Agree to disagree, new narratives are made everyday for the Cowboys, so I don't buy into made up narratives.

BINGO or to say it another way. FOOLS GOLD

 

[America's Cowboy]

Yes it is. But it doesn’t fit the narrative .

The narrative is something you are trying to build because you refuse to accept the facts.

 

[America's Cowboy]

And still has a losing record vs winning teams PLUS not a single NFC Conference game. Get this team to that game Dak

 

[Diehardblues]

The narrative is something you are trying to build because you refuse to accept the facts.

They could also argue you are unwilling to accept the narrative based on the current facts. Which BTW until end of season are evolving .

 

[Kevinicus]

I asked the genius mouth breather. Didn't ask you or anyone who I thought has comprehension skills but here you go showing yourself again

Might want to reread your posts. They are not written from a position of understanding.

 

[Kevinicus]

You're wrong and you know it. No fool has any base to argue "the Cowboys have not beaten a .500+ team in 2023" midway through the season when in reality the Cowboys did beat a .500+ team AT THE TIME during Week 2. You can't have it both ways just to fit YOUR NARRATIVE. End-of-season or after-date-played team records does not accurately explain whether a team has beaten a .500+ rated team or not. Take this to any legal court, and you will lose your argument. Guaranteed.

No rational person views things like you're presenting them.

It would be pure idiocy to do it like that.