goshan;3270679 said:
Just to be clear on my thoughts:
1. romo is a top 5-7 QB and I think he is great.
2. But he isn't as good as Brees yet.
3. Romo would not have gone 32/37 in that game and we know it. When has he done that?
Do you guys really disagree on #2 and #3?
#2 I can honestly see people making a case for that and I don't have any issue with it. It's subjective from person to person but a case can certainly be made for Brees being a little better.
Though I can make the cause that Romo is the better Qb just as easily, so it goes both ways. But, for your question, yes I could easily agree with you on that.
#3 I don't agree. you have ZERO idea what he could do in that game, against that defense, with that kind of protection.
Lets not act like Brees went 32 of 37 in the game while running around, scrambling, having to make time for his receivers cause his O-Line is painfully average. Brees had ALL DAY to make those plays cause he has an O-Line that can actually pass block very well.
So you have zero idea of what Romo could or couldn't do in the same situation.
dallascowboyfanboy;3270798 said:
Talk about revisionist history. When Emmitt was not producing late in his career in Dallas, a la when the O_line sucked during his last years ( losing Stepnoski in FA was huge) fans were calling for Emmitt to retire. Everyone wanted Hambrick to start because he was averaging 5.0 yards a carry.:laugh2:
Not me. I hated Hambrick with a passion. Emmitt is my all time favorite Cowboy and I felt he still showed back then that while he wasn't as good as he once was he was still more than good enough to produce. I always felt that Hambrick was a by-product of teams not worrying about the run when Emmitt wasn't in the game and so it helped make Hambrick look better than he ever was.
Which I do believe panned out to be reality the moment Emmitt was no long there.
zrinkill;3270825 said:
Fanboy is a term originating in the
United States, used to describe a male who is highly devoted and
biased in opinion towards a single subject or hobby.
Homer is to describe someone who has a close devotion to a sports team. They are called a "homer" because they are part of a "home crowd and
biased to their chosen team.
OOOOOOOOOOOOH! That one left a mark.
CowboyMcCoy;3270827 said:
And Kurt Warner over Romo? WTH?
I can see how someone is making that claim based off the body of work. I don't know how anyone would honestly take Warner over Romo in the present as the QB you'd rather have going forward but I can definately see how they put Warner above him based on the entire body of work to this point.
Of course that wasn't really the question as it's the top 5 in the NFL right now and not top 5 based on their entire career.
CowboyMcCoy;3270854 said:
Wow, I think we have a lot of fans who don't really know what we have in Romo.
And this surprises you? It should have been pretty obvious over the last 2 years that there are still a few fans that don't quite realise what they've got.