theogt
Surrealist
- Messages
- 45,846
- Reaction score
- 5,912
Wow, sounds like I got under your skin.Hostile;1077436 said:Enjoy your wait. You've offered nothing to change my mind. Not that I thought you could.
Wow, sounds like I got under your skin.Hostile;1077436 said:Enjoy your wait. You've offered nothing to change my mind. Not that I thought you could.
theogt;1077446 said:Link?
Get your ears checked.theogt;1077455 said:Wow, sounds like I got under your skin.
I think that's exactly right....WV Cowboy;1077262 said:I have not read through this entire thread so this may have been posted.
I have felt all along that Bledsoe gives us the best chance to make the playoffs.
But what if we do make the playoffs, any playoff caliber defense will do the same thing to us and Bledsoe as we saw today.
The Bears, Carolina, Philly, Seattle.
They all know right where he will be standing 3 seconds after the snap on passing downs.
I was surprised they didn't blitz more.
Romo's maneuverability at least would take away their total dominance of our OL on passing plays.
Although Romo has not played, he is way ahead of a rookie.
We may think about making the switch and Bledsoe can be the vet backup.
The only thing he's said is, "Bledsoe gives us the best chance to win." Talk about a lame argument. I didn't mean to offend you BP, but it's good to see you stick up for your friends.BrAinPaiNt;1077463 said:This thread....if you can't find it or don't like it, just sit in the bar waiting.
Nuff said.
LAST CALL!
theogt;1077473 said:The only thing he's said is, "Bledsoe gives us the best chance to win." Talk about a lame argument. I didn't mean to offend you BP, but it's good to see you stick up for your friends.
He's not sticking up for me. If he felt I was wrong he'd say so. he does that quite frequently.theogt;1077473 said:The only thing he's said is, "Bledsoe gives us the best chance to win." Talk about a lame argument. I didn't mean to offend you BP, but it's good to see you stick up for your friends.
I pulled no card. Just asking him to stick to arguments not personal attacks.BrAinPaiNt;1077492 said:Not sticking up for hos.
Just think no matter what he says at this point you will disagree with.
You don't share his opinions so you pull the he is picking on me card, than once that did not work you keep going on about waiting.
Keep waiting because he gave his opinon whether you liked it or not.
Just because you don't agree with his opinions does not mean he did not answer you.
Michael88Irvin;1077138 said:You heard it hear first... the announcement will come Tuesday
Perfect game to get Romo's feet wet and give him the confidence to step up and dominate v. the Giants...
He beats the Giants on 10/23 and will remain the starter the rest of the year.
This is not the end of the world, and this loss may be a blessing in disguise if we get a quarterback in there who can win games rather than single-handedly lose 4-6 each year.
Romo can take us to the Superbowl... I say he is better than Roethlisberger was and we have better weapons. Who says a young QB can't take a team to the Superbowl?
BrAinPaiNt;1077492 said:Not sticking up for hos.
Just think no matter what he says at this point you will disagree with.
You don't share his opinions so you pull the he is picking on me card, than once that did not work you keep going on about waiting.
Keep waiting because he gave his opinon whether you liked it or not.
Just because you don't agree with his opinions does not mean he did not answer you.
All that means is you can't handle it that I have the temerity to disagree with you because I didn't attack you personally or in any other way. If I do, by all means report me. Please. But don't whine about my disagreeing if you can't handle it.theogt;1077501 said:I pulled no card. Just asking him to stick to arguments not personal attacks.
Oh how easily you forget.Hostile;1077497 said:He's not sticking up for me. If he felt I was wrong he'd say so. he does that quite frequently.
I also didn't say Bledsoe "gives us the best chance to win." That is how you're interpreting it and that's your right.
Hostile;1076762 said:I don't dislike Romo. I never have. I just think Bledsoe is our best option.
I wouldn't report you even if you called me names directly. However, to say you were subtlely attacking me personally is laughable. I really couldn't care less.Hostile;1077526 said:All that means is you can't handle it that I have the temerity to disagree with you because I didn't attack you personally or in any other way. If I do, by all means report me. Please. But don't whine about my disagreeing if you can't handle it.
jrumann59;1077066 said:How many great qb's as you put it started for a playoff capable team. Most qb's get thrown into the fire because the team itself has hit rock bottom and they know that they do not thave the personnel to win more than 8 games.
Okay, so I did say it that way. That isn't the way you were quoting me, but it's the same thought. I had previously said several times that Bledsoe earned the job and it hasn't been taken away from him. You rejected that. That is what I meant and what I mean. No handouts.theogt;1077528 said:Oh how easily you forget.
I get it. You think Bledsoe is better than Romo. I just don't understand why you think so poorly of Romo.Hostile;1077505 said:
Will I hear a whoosh? Or will he finally get it?
Bob Dole;1077272 said:And you realize that means absolutely nothing, right?
We were 2-2 at the beginning of last season too, with "less talent".
This isn't last season. We might be 9-7 again, and if Drew continues like this we might even be worse.
And right now, Bledsoe looks ten times worse than he did at the beginning of last year.
How does a guy who has already lost two games for this team, give them the "best chance to win"?