Anybody else still wishing we would have taken a RB in 3rd round?

Dodger12

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
3,532
they're not here to replace murray, they're here to manage the running game. no ONE player is here to replace murray and i still want you to name ANY SINGLE RB TAKEN in last years draft that would give you a warm fuzzy, other than we have a new name to kick around and hope for.

well, we have that now in michael. it can easily be argued that he's better than what we could have gotten in the draft AND has that vaunted (2) years experience you're waxing upset about for green. so in effect you just contradicted yourself in some mad effort to stay angry about not drafting a rb.

have fun.

I said in my opening remark that none of our RB can repeat Murray's performance. I don't expect them to, it was a record setting year. And I'm not "upset" about 2 years of experience for Green. I'm questioning the logic of spending a 3rd pick on a guy that is injured and can't contribute but we're depending on him to replace Free at RT.

And I'm glad you think that Michael may be better than than anyone we could have drafted. He very well may be....but what did you base this opinion on? Were you at his home sitting on his couch and watching the game with him Sunday night?
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,435
Reaction score
7,953
I said in my opening remark that none of our RB can repeat Murray's performance. I don't expect them to, it was a record setting year. And I'm not "upset" about 2 years of experience for Green. I'm questioning the logic of spending a 3rd pick on a guy that is injured and can't contribute but we're depending on him to replace Free at RT.

And I'm glad you think that Michael may be better than than anyone we could have drafted. He very well may be....but what did you base this opinion on? Were you at his home sitting on his couch and watching the game with him Sunday night?

i would suppose the same criteria you used to judge each and every back coming out of the last draft to arrive at your sense of anguish at the abject failure of the cowboys to address such a glaring need through the ONLY way available to the cowboys EVER.

so yea, maybe we're both messed up.
 

Dodger12

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
3,532
i would suppose the same criteria you used to judge each and every back coming out of the last draft to arrive at your sense of anguish at the abject failure of the cowboys to address such a glaring need through the ONLY way available to the cowboys EVER.

so yea, maybe we're both messed up.

Ice, do yourself a favor. Don't try to act or talk smart; it's a big fail. I don't feel like using a universal translator to decipher a post.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,617
Reaction score
19,896
Yeah, same regurgitation of the team's answer.

Throw in an RKG reference and win a blue star sticker.

There is zero chance, Z.E.R. FRIGGIN. O., we will look back at the 2015 NFL draft in 5 years and not see a better RB still on the board at our 3rd round pick than the collection of crap we already had on the roster.

well, we do need a swing tackle and it looks like the coaches knew the guy they had on the roster wasn't any good. but don't let that little fact get in the way of our infatuations. and why would any RB taken in the 3rd round be any better that what's on the roster?

and btw, every team and I mean every team is looking back to the draft from 5 years ago and wish they would have taken a different player.
 

Awakened

the Dude abides
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
1,228
i would suppose the same criteria you used to judge each and every back coming out of the last draft to arrive at your sense of anguish at the abject failure of the cowboys to address such a glaring need through the ONLY way available to the cowboys EVER.

so yea, maybe we're both messed up.

Everyone agreed this past draft was the strongest collection of RBs seen in many years. Dallas had a chance do some serious evaluation (not saying they didn't) and be intentional about taking a back early. I understand taking Gregory in the second round, but the next pick should have been dedicated to a RB (or move up). Teams including the Cowboys draft for need all the time - to deny that is bunk. They didn't recognize the need or the opportunity in the draft. Many fans and experts were flummoxed by their decision. At this point, looking at many of the rookies and what we have at RB, I think they blew it. Not the end of the world, but a poor decision. Simply put, they didn't put a high enough priority on finding a back, banking on the success of Randle and McFadden. Yet IMO it looks like many of the rookie RBs are as good as advertised, several of them better than Randle or McFadden. I think our team would be stronger if we had drafted one of them.

BTW, I think the Cowboys' decision to go out and trade for Christine Michael is evidence that they second-guessed their decision, something many fans and experts had been doing since the draft ended.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,869
Reaction score
38,473
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Everyone agreed this past draft was the strongest collection of RBs seen in many years. Dallas had a chance do some serious evaluation (not saying they didn't) and be intentional about taking a back early. I understand taking Gregory in the second round, but the next pick should have been dedicated to a RB (or move up). Teams including the Cowboys draft for need all the time - to deny that is bunk. They didn't recognize the need or the opportunity in the draft. Many fans and experts were flummoxed by their decision. At this point, looking at many of the rookies and what we have at RB, I think they blew it. Not the end of the world, but a poor decision. Simply put, they didn't put a high enough priority on finding a back, banking on the success of Randle and McFadden. Yet IMO it looks like many of the rookie RBs are as good as advertised, several of them better than Randle or McFadden. I think our team would be stronger if we had drafted one of them.

BTW, I think the Cowboys' decision to go out and trade for Christine Michael is evidence that they second-guessed their decision, something many fans and experts had been doing since the draft ended.

They were very much intent on taking a HB. I think Gregory being off the board would have meant Coleman was our 2nd rounder. I think the draft unfolded in such an unexpected manor for them it didnt fall for them on the HB front and they didnt want to panic. Gordon went off the board in the first. He probably would have been the pick. Yeldon who I belive was a day 2 target went ridiculously early. Even if he fell with Gregory there they wouldn't have taken him. Coleman was probably a guy they would have traded up for if he made it to the mid 3rd but he didnt. I dont think they had much interest in Duke Johnson, David Johnson , David Cobb or Matt Jones so they were probably out of the 3rd round convo. In the 4th it seems they were targeting Buck Allen and Mike Davis but they both went right before our picks. This to me was the end of were we could have gotten a potential starter, and while guys like Yeldon or Coleman probably go into training camp as starters, Davis and Allen would have at least started behind Randle and McFadden. Davis IMO would have won the competition in TC/Preseason. Allen wouldnt have. As far as that goes, I would take Davis over Michael. But Micheal over Allen
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,435
Reaction score
7,953
Everyone agreed this past draft was the strongest collection of RBs seen in many years. Dallas had a chance do some serious evaluation (not saying they didn't) and be intentional about taking a back early. I understand taking Gregory in the second round, but the next pick should have been dedicated to a RB (or move up). Teams including the Cowboys draft for need all the time - to deny that is bunk. They didn't recognize the need or the opportunity in the draft. Many fans and experts were flummoxed by their decision. At this point, looking at many of the rookies and what we have at RB, I think they blew it. Not the end of the world, but a poor decision. Simply put, they didn't put a high enough priority on finding a back, banking on the success of Randle and McFadden. Yet IMO it looks like many of the rookie RBs are as good as advertised, several of them better than Randle or McFadden. I think our team would be stronger if we had drafted one of them.

BTW, I think the Cowboys' decision to go out and trade for Christine Michael is evidence that they second-guessed their decision, something many fans and experts had been doing since the draft ended.

and i think, as i said when we didn't draft someone, they didn't like them and would likely pick up someone just before the season started.

i just don't see the need to hyper-over-analyze every single move made and wah-nostalgic because we didn't take a rb. as for it being a strong RB group, great. still doesn't mean they went SON OF A *****!!! the other day and went into panic mode. if an rb fell to them they liked and were in a position to draft, i think they would have. to get mad they didn't is to get mad they didn't "reach" (at least on their board) to me and that would just be a different reason to be mad.

1) make your picks according to your board and no RB is drafted. complaints.
2) make your picks and in the top 3 rounds, reach for a RB to fill this "hole" (nevermind randle was already drafted and had some time developing, we need to start over and make people happy) so they do - complaints on the reach.
3) trade down and go for a player at a better spot. said player you were targeting gets drafted.

you guessed it...complaints.

looking at the 3 options there, and feel free to list more if you'd like, even if they don't end in "complaints" (good luck) and i'll be glad to listen, but i think going off our board was our best bet and finding an RB they like later the proper move.

since this is what happened, i was to a point right about what they would do after not drafting anyone and their not being interested in any aging vets. no big deal cause i'm wrong a lot more often and no, i had zero idea who they would target, just thought they would.

so no. i don't see it as a second guess, just what they decided to do as the course of events unfolded and fans are upset cause they had a box not checked off on their Cowboys note pad next to their beer.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Still think that decision might come back to bite us. Why didn't we take Matt Jones or Karlos Williams, or try to trade up and take Telvin Coleman? I'll admit not many knew how good Karlos Williams might be, but everyone was aware of the talent of Jones and Coleman.

Trading up for Coleman might've cost our 4th round pick, but I'd trade Green and Wilson for Coleman.

OMG you arent kidding. Matt Jones, Karlos Williams? I was just thinking the same thing. This was probably the deepest RB draft we have seen in a long time and the Cowboy failed to take advantage. And why? Because of Jerry's man love for McChicken? Wow, talk about a joke.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
102,744
Reaction score
115,242
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
OMG you arent kidding. Matt Jones, Karlos Williams? I was just thinking the same thing. This was probably the deepest RB draft we have seen in a long time and the Cowboy failed to take advantage. And why? Because of Jerry's man love for McChicken? Wow, talk about a joke.

:laugh:
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,435
Reaction score
7,953
OMG you arent kidding. Matt Jones, Karlos Williams? I was just thinking the same thing. This was probably the deepest RB draft we have seen in a long time and the Cowboy failed to take advantage. And why? Because of Jerry's man love for McChicken? Wow, talk about a joke.

some people just invent reasons to hate things.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
No.

There wasn't anyone available that was better than what we had. Same answer today as it was 4 months ago right after the draft.

Williams looked great. David Johnson looked amazing, and Matt Jones has been getting great reviews.

But certainly its too early to know for sure. Which makes it a little puzzling how you know already. Not to mention Randle didnt look all world either.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,435
Reaction score
7,953
Williams looked great. David Johnson looked amazing, and Matt Jones has been getting great reviews.

But certainly its too early to know for sure. Which makes it a little puzzling how you know already. Not to mention Randle didnt look all world either.

same way people know this is the best class of RBs to come out in quite awhile, i suppose.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
some people just invent reasons to hate things.

Relax, the grown ups are talking...............

And some people are just blind homers that don't like any criticism of anything Cowboy. I hate to break the news to you, but everything isnt rosey love juice in Cowboy land.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
same way people know this is the best class of RBs to come out in quite awhile, i suppose.

Those were the opinions of many experts that I happen to agree with. Or you can just go by how many backs went in the first few rounds. Or the first round for that matter. But logic isnt what its about for you. Its just about defending your beloved Cowboys. :flagwave:

:lmao:
 

Tommy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,223
Reaction score
2,985
Still think that decision might come back to bite us. Why didn't we take Matt Jones or Karlos Williams, or try to trade up and take Telvin Coleman? I'll admit not many knew how good Karlos Williams might be, but everyone was aware of the talent of Jones and Coleman.

Trading up for Coleman might've cost our 4th round pick, but I'd trade Green and Wilson for Coleman.

If somehow CMike could haver re-entered the draft this year and we took him in the third round would that make everyone happy?
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
some people just invent reasons to hate things.

Honestly, if your not corned about the Cowboys RB situation, then you simply dont like the Cowboys.

Were you unfazed by our pass rush last year too? When someone said we needed pass rushers this off season did you cry that they were bad fans? :muttley:
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
If somehow CMike could haver re-entered the draft this year and we took him in the third round would that make everyone happy?

If we all told you that the RB situation was incredible and the Cowboys had all pro's at every position would that make you happy?
 

TrailBlazer

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,845
Reaction score
3,535
I don't like the Chaz green pick. I would've went another route but idk about RB. The one we would've taken is Jay Ajayi who is now on IR. Karlos Williams isn't all that IMO.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
same way people know this is the best class of RBs to come out in quite awhile, i suppose.

so are you saying that this isnt the best RB class to come out in a while?

Do you actually have an opinion or do you just go around bashing other people for having one?
 
Top