Jerry is one cowardly old man!

DizzG;1366258 said:
too bad is was nothing but crap

Crap to blind rose-colored glasses wearing, card-carrying homers. The truth never finds these guys. Reality sucks for them so they can't take it and assume each next week will bring glory. When in fact it rarely does because of the decisions that are made by now Jerry again solely and previously Fat Bastid....Now we have another Tubba the Hutt to look forward to seeing on the sidelines. Total embarassment....
 
stiletto;1366279 said:
Crap to blind rose-colored glasses wearing, card-carrying homers.

Yea because anyone who finds anything positive about there favorite team is a homer to you negative nancy's .....

go enjoy you're misery ..... noone deserves it more. :lmao2:
 
Wood;1366275 said:
Personally, I dont have a problem with Wade as HC. But jeez....just let the guy pick his own defensive coaches. There is just noway that Bowles would be high on Wade list of coaches he wants....so if Bowles is named DC...this basically tells me that Jerry is the quasi-head coach...high up in his office.

True. It'll be interesting to see what Jerry allows Wade to do.
 
VA Cowboy;1366307 said:
True. It'll be interesting to see what Jerry allows Wade to do.
Kind of like when he forced Parcells to keep Zimmer, come on guys, bowles will be hired because he's qualified.
 
stiletto;1366279 said:
Crap to blind rose-colored glasses wearing, card-carrying homers. The truth never finds these guys. Reality sucks for them so they can't take it and assume each next week will bring glory. When in fact it rarely does because of the decisions that are made by now Jerry again solely and previously Fat Bastid....Now we have another Tubba the Hutt to look forward to seeing on the sidelines. Total embarassment....

So the best criticism you can make of the guy is his weight?

Weak.
 
VA Cowboy;1366063 said:
That's what I thought, you can't answer the question...nice blowoff.

that's my whole point VA. i can, will and have answered it. you disagree. i say we just disagree you say there's a right or wrong to be had. you're in search of something i just don't care about in these conversations.

winning/being right.

of which proves the point.
 
stiletto;1366252 said:
Sorry I mean Greg Ellis, you're right about that. In a 3-4 a strong safety has to cover way more than he should. Roy Williams is TOTALLY not fit for that duty. Any blind person could see that or did you go to the stevie wonder school of player evaluation? LMAO!

Apparently former Cowboy Darren Woodson doesn't "see" it your way:

Woody:
  • This hire totally surprised me. You hear and see in the newspapers that it's Norv. Jerry made a decision to go with the defense. They were pretty good on offense last year.
  • I think the 3-4 was the biggest influence in the hire. They have drafted for the 3-4 over the last couple of years. Wade knows how to bring pressure from different angles with a defense.
  • One thing about the 3-4 last year is that ours was pretty stagnant. If you watch SD or Pittsburgh you will see the aggressive style. He will find the right way to use Roy and I think he may be the one player that flourishes most under Phillips. The OLB's should should flourish as well.
  • We'll have to wait and see if Jason is ready yet. I think he may be. I've known him for many years. He has a brilliant, brilliant mind when it comes to the offense. Troy will tell you that Jason helped him with his game. He really knows the fine points on offense. He has a great personality and he will help Romo alot. Romo will gravitate to him.
  • I do not want to coach. I am not built to be a coach. I don't have that type of patience.
  • I think this is a playoff team, especially in the NFC. I think the Cowboys on any given day could have beaten Chicago last year. With Jason on the offensive side and Wade being a top-flight defensive coach makes Dallas a SB caliber team. Defense wins championships and this team has the talent to be dominant.
  • Nate said the offense carried the 90's teams. Are you kidding me big man? No way. Bottom line, defense wins championships.
  • I've always loved Norv Turner, but if I'm looking at it from a championship standpoint, they made the best hire. Wade is a great defensive mind and he will make this team better, next year.
 
stiletto;1366279 said:
Crap to blind rose-colored glasses wearing, card-carrying homers. The truth never finds these guys. Reality sucks for them so they can't take it and assume each next week will bring glory. When in fact it rarely does because of the decisions that are made by now Jerry again solely and previously Fat Bastid....Now we have another Tubba the Hutt to look forward to seeing on the sidelines. Total embarassment....

blah...blah...blah. You are not the one based in reality
 
stasheroo;1366325 said:
Apparently former Cowboy Darren Woodson doesn't "see" it your way:

Hmmm will I listen to Darren or little High heels?

:lmao:
 
Aikbach;1366312 said:
Kind of like when he forced Parcells to keep Zimmer, come on guys, bowles will be hired because he's qualified.

If so, then Wade shouldn't have a problem retaining him. But...it should be his choice. Same with Sparano. If they are both kept along with Garrett being hired, then it would be a tough sell to say it was all Wade's decisions.

That's all I'm saying - it isn't usually a good thing when the HC can't determine his own staff.
 
VA Cowboy;1366337 said:
That's all I'm saying - it isn't usually a good thing when the HC can't determine his own staff.

And noone has said that he can't ........ except you and the rest of the clown brigade.
 
iceberg;1366319 said:
that's my whole point VA. i can, will and have answered it. you disagree. i say we just disagree you say there's a right or wrong to be had. you're in search of something i just don't care about in these conversations.

winning/being right.

of which proves the point.

Actually it doesn't prove any point. Because the issue was a reference to me wanting to lose and be right. That's totally ludicrous. I'd much rather be wrong and see us win. The guy is totally of base in his claim.
 
zrinkill;1366339 said:
And noone has said that he can't ........ except you and the rest of the clown brigade.

You must not be paying attention then. Even Chief's post, which you agreed with, said it looks like Jerry is going to retain Bowles and Sparano. How does that, coupled with his hire of Garrett, show that the HC is hiring his own staff?

I know you want to defend Jerry so much that it's skewing your ability to think rationally.
 
VA Cowboy;1366337 said:
If so, then Wade shouldn't have a problem retaining him. But...it should be his choice. Same with Sparano. If they are both kept along with Garrett being hired, then it would be a tough sell to say it was all Wade's decisions.

That's all I'm saying - it isn't usually a good thing when the HC can't determine his own staff.

and given where we are - you choose to ONLY SEE the "facts" that damn jjones.

he "hired" 1 person. that's it. he kept who he viewed some key members around and denied them permission to go elsewhere.

most of the "good" coaches for assistants aren't exactly just sitting around waiting for wade at this point. he's got what, 7-8 coaches to go hire. but instead of seeing that he can and will put his stamp on the coaches, you pull out what suits your view and ignore the rest of the facts.

why? only thing zrin and i can think of is that you need to be right more than...

: )

seriously, you're way down the road on what has yet to even be done yet, you damn jones already.

why? maybe for the same reasons i slammed parcells - but at least i give unconditional credit for what parcells did right while here. you've yet to do that for jones.

it's like being wrong or something...
 
VA Cowboy;1366341 said:
Actually it doesn't prove any point. Because the issue was a reference to me wanting to lose and be right. That's totally ludicrous. I'd much rather be wrong and see us win. The guy is totally of base in his claim.

to you i'm sure he is as it's not a very flattering viewpoint. but like i said, he's not alone *in* that viewpoint.
 
stiletto;1365991 said:
Yeah, helping restore the Bears defense to top 3 for two straight years is nothing.. all his players saying they love playing for him and he deserves to be a coach means nothing. But us getting someone elses trash (Buffalo/Denver) is great! wooohoo. Let me go celebrate mediocrity...At least Parcells had actually WON a playoff game before becomming our coach.
And you saying Phillips is a bad hire, cowardly act, etc. also means nothing. You're in no more a position than any of us to know what the future holds, so guess away. We understand you don't like it. I suspect what you're really after is the attention of your post, given the number of replies you've put up since it's started.

You're typing so fast, you don't even have time to check what you're posting.:eek:

The Cowboys are not out to make either of us happy. It's a bigger picture than that. But carry on, by all means. It's entertaining if nothing else.
:lmao2:
 
VA Cowboy;1366349 said:
You must not be paying attention then. Even Chief's post, which you agreed with, said it looks like Jerry is going to retain Bowles and Sparano. How does that, coupled with his hire of Garrett, show that the HC is hiring his own staff?

I know you want to defend Jerry so much that it's skewing your ability to think rationally.

i know you want to slam jerry so much that it's skewing your ability to think rationally.

wow - change 1 word and it suits YOU to a T also.

except both zrin and i can openly talk about the good and bad jones has done - AND WE HAVE DONE JUST THAT several times in the past.

like i challenged you to earlier - find a jones compliment where you give him full credit for something that isn't backhanded, conditional, or followed with a "but..." to demean it at the same time.

you can't, cause you've never done it.

so we're *not* the same type of people in this regard because we talk openly and w/o conditions about jones - good and bad.

you just talk about the bad.

distinct difference.
 
VA Cowboy;1366349 said:
You must not be paying attention then. Even Chief's post, which you agreed with, said it looks like Jerry is going to retain Bowles and Sparano. How does that, coupled with his hire of Garrett, show that the HC is hiring his own staff?

I know you want to defend Jerry so much that it's skewing your ability to think rationally.

Did Parcells keep alot of the old staff? Was he Jerry's puppet? Did Jimmy keep alot of Landry's staff? Was he a puppet to the evil Jones?

You're hatred has made you blind to you're own silly thought process.
 
zrinkill;1366361 said:
Did Parcells keep alot of the old staff? Was he Jerry's puppet? Did Jimmy keep alot of Landry's staff? Was he a puppet to the evil Jones?

You're hatred has made you blind to you're own silly thought process.

but z - it's different cause he was parcells and that makes it so. while parcells could have kept or fired any of his assistants, to VA, phillips doesn't have that luxury.

why?

cause that would mess up a perfectly good hate he's got going on.
 
Jimmy Johnson brought in almost all of "his" coaches. That was the last time this team truely experienced success.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,327
Messages
13,866,387
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top