wileedog;1306546 said:
The best part of when I see a post including the words "a serious lack of football knowledge." is that I know the poster is a friggin idiot.
Zimms D had every single problem you described *before* Parcells came here.
Thanks for playing.
The "a serious lack of football knowledge." was a quote from Rac that I was just repeating. But thank you for the idiot remark.
Let me 1st say I have no problem with Zim being gone nor would I had a problem if he had stayed. The D will not change until BP is gone or changes his ways. Zim had the same problems with a lot less talent before BP arrived. BP is a control freak. Any game plan or lack there of was on BP. Anyone who thinks that Zim sat in his little DC office and game planed without a VERY LARGE input from BP is crazy. Does anyone really think the last 6 weeks of the season that BP watched game film and told Zim just keep what you're doing?
We either dont have as much talent on D as we thought or it isnt being used correctly. Either way it falls on BP. Bring in any DC you want but the D will be ran the way BP wants it. Which to me is a bad thing.
Look at Bal, Pitt, Miami, NE, and SD. Do they have more talent on D? 4 of them were in the top 5 of sacks in the NFL with Pitt being 11. I just dont see them having more talent than us. I see them having better game plans than us. Even if you think Zim was behind ALL the game plans then BP should had stepped in and changed it but he didnt. Which still falls on BP.