You can demand exhaustive analysis but as opposed to your position which is based on nothing, I know what I find more compelling.
I have a tremendous respect for Vela. Those were plays he used to highlight the overarching point.
Still waiting for your basis for indicting Linehan. Anything at all.
I'm not demanding an exhaustive analysts..
The point is two plays, one which doesn't even show improper route-running but Dez looking over his shoulder, doesn't demonstrate any trend. He's making a claim, but his evidence is weak.
Even Vela admitted Dez 'blew' one route against the Giants and then Dallas didn't use him from the middle again. If he was open, but made a minor mistake, it's the coaches fault for not going to it again out of multiple chances. But they didn't.
One could argue that Dez was at fault, but that was also a poor throw by Romo. You can't assume that just because it's a timing route, by default it's Dez's fault anyways. That's an assumption.
If you consider him your number 1 receiver and expect to toss the ball up to him and come down with it in double-coverage, say he's been lighting up training camp and is uncoverable, then it's pretty much hogwash to claim that applied only to basic routes that any WR can run..
And it's not Linehan's playbook anyway. It's Garrett's passing offense. When Linehan was in Detroit, Reggie Bush, a RB, was a 1000 yard receiver I believe.
Like I said, even the use of TO was questioned here.