Bware_Dware
Active Member
- Messages
- 149
- Reaction score
- 52
About the same chances of Sean Lee getting comeback player of the year this year
agree he wins hands down, meaning whether people are raising their hands to voter for Garrett or keeping them down while writing their votes for him, either way it goes he will be winning it this season.
agree he wins hands down, meaning whether people are raising their hands to voter for Garrett or keeping them down while writing their votes for him, either way it goes he will be winning it this season.
Lets say we have a healthy team and play well, making the playoffs.. The defense is vastly improved and no in game miscues. Could Red be recognized an awarded the Coach of the Year?
Absolutely none. If we get to the playoffs, it will be in spite of him not because of him.
It wasn't even a mistake, much less an embarrassment.
Which always cracks me up, because Garrett had a significant clock management error in the same series leading up to the time out that gets a fraction of the criticism using the time out as he should have when his ST wanted it does.
Lets say we have a healthy team and play well, making the playoffs.. The defense is vastly improved and no in game miscues. Could Red be recognized an awarded the Coach of the Year?
The problem Idgit is that Garrett has made so many late game mistakes that everything is viewed from this perspective now. If this had happened to hoodie and was a one time thing, it would have blown over. However, Garrett has been criticized very publicly for late game mistakes by everybody from fans to Troy Aikman himself. Even the owner and general manager has said Garrett is currently a "trainee" and the team will benefit from all of these mistakes in the future.
Kinda like the way Romo is labeled a choker, Garrett is labeled as a trainee head coach that has blows games in the most unique ways possible. Just like with Romo, its going to take deep playoff runs to try to erase this label. Going 8-8 each year only reinforces the image that is already out there for both of them, that's just reality.
The trainee argument has already been disposed of and it sounds like you need to refresh yourself of the context again. Other than that, the argument is very much like the Romo choker argument. Which is to say, the issue is massively overblown and not very accurate.
I don't really care if and when the label gets erased. I just want him to concentrate on building the team. If the defense improves, fans will immediately forget what they were complaining about. That's the nature of fans.
What do you mean it's been disposed of?
The actual quote and it's context have been pointed out, and his intentional misinterpretation has been repeatedly addressed.
Is this posted somewhere?
The actual quote and it's context have been pointed out, and his intentional misinterpretation has been repeatedly addressed.
The actual quote and it's context have been pointed out, and his intentional misinterpretation has been repeatedly addressed.