CouchCoach
Staff member
- Messages
- 41,122
- Reaction score
- 74,904
Yes, because Gruden wanted him there. He's there for talent evaluation for the youngsters more than calling the shots. With Gruden, that would be the same as NE having a GM.Eh, I don't think it is that bad of a deal.
Also, Gruden taking a lot of heat in this thread about his moves (and I will agree some are very curious), but, isn't Mike Mayock the new GM in Oakland/Las Vegas?
I think the way he views this deal with Brown is if he's going to pay top dollar, he'd rather pay it to Brown rather than Cooper, who will get a sweet deal as well. And to top that off, he gets a 1st and gives up a 3rd and 5th.
I understand this deal and I think the Mack deal was a Belichick process. Gruden surmised what it would cost to keep a player like Mack and that would be a longer term deal and did what Belichick did with Collins and Jones only he got a 1st rounder. What we don't know was how long was Cooper being dangled as trade bait and did he hold out until the Cowboys were in desperation mode? And I don't fault them at all, I believe Cooper is worth a 1st and they needed a #1WR badly.
The other thing about his moves is he's in a division with two high octane offenses and some would think 'why not build the D to stop them' and I think he's more interested in building the O to stay with them. It is hard to build a D and keep it together because there are far better O players than D's.